Saturday, December 24, 2011
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Victory: McDonald’s outsmarts San Francisco on Happy Meal ban « Hot Air
Victory: McDonald’s outsmarts San Francisco on Happy Meal ban « Hot Air
Here is a good example of a workability/disad for a policy debate.
Here is a good example of a workability/disad for a policy debate.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Saturday, October 15, 2011
John Irving Kicks Me in the Balls, Again. Shame on Me.
John Irving is my favorite writer and I just finished his most recent book, "Last Night in Twisted River." It features the usual bear, wrestling, and New Hampshire references. The novel follows the path that most of his other books do, disaster is stalking us and it will arrive regardless of what efforts we make to ward it off. The threat of death hovers over most of the story, but it is also punctuated by the ridiculous events, outlandish characters and disturbed descriptions that are hallmarks of his work. If I were to say it is somewhat self referential, he would probably make a disparaging comment about how shallow I am although I think I am serious and complimentary.
I felt a need to post because while I admire his craftsmanship, I resent the casual way in which he dismisses anyone that might see things differently than he does. Most of the novel has no clear political point of view, but in the last third or so, some venom starts creeping in. It begins with some withering commentary from a character that was at first secondary but takes a central position in the later stages of the story. The character is meant to be cantankerous so I plowed on and ignored the direction that I could see coming. As modern events creep into the plot of the story, it shifts focus from the wild set up and side trips we have been taking, and goes in a very distinct political direction.
Having invested as much time in the writing at this point that I had, I continued. I am sure that Irving would argue that these are the views of his characters and must therefore be respected as they have been earned by the travails they have suffered through or because of the innate wisdom of these souls. Most of it though comes out like a sucker punch, unrelated to what has gone on before and only relevant because the writer has made it so. Balance is not required by a fictional character, they are what the story makes them, but this story does not make these views relevant. I am sure that many readers dislike hearing themselves referred to in truly ugly ways. The writer is entitled to his vision, but that does not mean that it is correct or that it is appropriate.
There is no reason that a character in fiction should mirror the readers thoughts on the issues of the story, but neither is it necessary to attack those with whom one disagrees. If it starts as a satire, and then becomes a political tome, at least you know what you are getting into. I enjoyed ninety percent of the book, but the remaining ten had little to do with the story and it robbed me of my pleasure. Some would say that is the purpose of a novel like this, to slap us in the face for our beliefs when we are finally listening. Unfortunately, John Irving's book feels like a suicide bomber. It comes into your life, smiles at you and maybe even engages in friendly behavior. It's real purpose however is to explode all over you and take you down with it. I am just a stupid American, one who continues to invite an intellectual terrorist into my home because I like the way he writes and the stories he tells.
I felt a need to post because while I admire his craftsmanship, I resent the casual way in which he dismisses anyone that might see things differently than he does. Most of the novel has no clear political point of view, but in the last third or so, some venom starts creeping in. It begins with some withering commentary from a character that was at first secondary but takes a central position in the later stages of the story. The character is meant to be cantankerous so I plowed on and ignored the direction that I could see coming. As modern events creep into the plot of the story, it shifts focus from the wild set up and side trips we have been taking, and goes in a very distinct political direction.
Having invested as much time in the writing at this point that I had, I continued. I am sure that Irving would argue that these are the views of his characters and must therefore be respected as they have been earned by the travails they have suffered through or because of the innate wisdom of these souls. Most of it though comes out like a sucker punch, unrelated to what has gone on before and only relevant because the writer has made it so. Balance is not required by a fictional character, they are what the story makes them, but this story does not make these views relevant. I am sure that many readers dislike hearing themselves referred to in truly ugly ways. The writer is entitled to his vision, but that does not mean that it is correct or that it is appropriate.
There is no reason that a character in fiction should mirror the readers thoughts on the issues of the story, but neither is it necessary to attack those with whom one disagrees. If it starts as a satire, and then becomes a political tome, at least you know what you are getting into. I enjoyed ninety percent of the book, but the remaining ten had little to do with the story and it robbed me of my pleasure. Some would say that is the purpose of a novel like this, to slap us in the face for our beliefs when we are finally listening. Unfortunately, John Irving's book feels like a suicide bomber. It comes into your life, smiles at you and maybe even engages in friendly behavior. It's real purpose however is to explode all over you and take you down with it. I am just a stupid American, one who continues to invite an intellectual terrorist into my home because I like the way he writes and the stories he tells.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Paul Ryan: Why Raising Taxes Hurts Job Creation
Simple Math. Stop with the Talking Points that try to turn one group against another.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
California Politicians as Gangsters.
This is the perfect metaphor for the government and the people. If the State is suffering, "@%*#& you, pay me." If the taxpayers are overwhelmed," @%#& you, pay me." If businesses are are the brink of financial insolvency"@%#& you,pay me." The California Teachers Association is made up of Goodfellas .
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Friday, July 1, 2011
Why The Left's Global Warming Agenda Is Flat Out Wrong
Not a science paper but a clear summary of the issue.
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Netanyahu: Borders Must Reflect 'Dramatic' Changes From 1967
A Statesman gives a great speech about what real peace is.
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
MEMEBUSTERS! THE OSAMA BIN LADEN EDITION
Bill Whittle is so clear, focused, and concise in these messages. I wish he had been a student of mine and I could point and say, that's how I told him to do it.
Monday, May 16, 2011
Thursday, May 5, 2011
He’s Back! More Mischief from the 37th President
He’s Back! More Mischief from the 37th President
I lived through it and every time he raises his head in the public arena, I am embarrassed. He should stick to his church and Habitat for Humanity. He is proof that the Nobel Prize for Peace means absolutely nothing.
I lived through it and every time he raises his head in the public arena, I am embarrassed. He should stick to his church and Habitat for Humanity. He is proof that the Nobel Prize for Peace means absolutely nothing.
Monday, May 2, 2011
US Naval Academy's Commandant's Speech After Bin Laden's Death
Dropped and Flushed. Go Navy, Go Seals, Go CIA, Go America.
Monday, April 18, 2011
Sarah Palin 4-16-11 Wisconsin Rally
This is a terrific political speech. It lays out the issues in clear manner and does so in a memorable way. The gauntlet has been thrown.
Monday, April 4, 2011
FORE YEAR TERM | RIGHTNETWORK
http://s3.amazonaws.com/rightnetwork-cms/1001642640/article/Fore%20Year%20Term.jpg?1299517024
FORE YEAR TERM | RIGHTNETWORK
Friday, March 25, 2011
Lower Education | The Weekly Standard
Lower Education | The Weekly Standard
A rational discussion of academic freedom in light of the Northwestern Sex class demonstration.
A rational discussion of academic freedom in light of the Northwestern Sex class demonstration.
Sunday, March 20, 2011
President Hamlet - Victor Davis Hanson - National Review Online
President Hamlet - Victor Davis Hanson - National Review Online
The perfect nickname for our non-leader.
The perfect nickname for our non-leader.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Monday, February 21, 2011
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)